Opinion · Supreme Court of Florida
Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc.
220 So. 2d 365
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Florida
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Date
- 1969-03-19
- Topic
- litigation
PER CURIAM. By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1968. We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A. Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is, therefore, denied.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Coleman v. Henry W. Brown & Sons, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
The petition for attorney’s fees is denied also.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.