Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

BRAREN v. LAWYERS' REALTY ABSTRACT CO., SARASOTA, 206 So.2d 385 (Fla. 1968)

206 So.2d 385

Type: Opinion
Court: Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1968-01-31
Topic: general

BRAREN v. LAWYERS' REALTY ABSTRACT CO., SARASOTA, 206 So.2d 385 (Fla. 1968) HERBERT H. BRAREN AND GEORGE H. HANSHAW, PETITIONERS, v. LAWYERS' REALTYABSTRACT CO.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BRAREN v. LAWYERS' REALTY ABSTRACT CO., SARASOTA, 206 So.2d 385 (Fla. 1968). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BRAREN v. LAWYERS' REALTY ABSTRACT CO., SARASOTA,206 So.2d 385(Fla. 1968)

HERBERT H. BRAREN AND GEORGE H. HANSHAW, PETITIONERS, v. LAWYERS' REALTY

ABSTRACT CO. OF SARASOTA, VICTOR KOSTECOS AND THELMA KOSTECOS, RESPONDENTS.

No. 36336.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 31, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Second District.196 So.2d 244.

Nelson, Stinnett, Surfus, Korp Payne, Sarasota, for petitioners.

Clyde H. Wilson, Philip P. Marvin and Clyde H. Wilson, Jr., Sarasota, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari and have now considered the matter on the record, the briefs and oral argument. After such consideration we find that the writ was improvidently issued and it is, therefore, herewith, discharged.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.Page 386