Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

BROWN v. BIRDSEYE DIVISION OF GENERAL FOODS CORP., 200 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1967)

200 So.2d 177

Type: Opinion
Court: Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1967-06-21
Topic: general

BROWN v. BIRDSEYE DIVISION OF GENERAL FOODS CORP., 200 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1967) LATTIE G. BROWN, PETITIONER, v. BIRDSEYE DIVISION OF GENERAL FOODSCORPORATION, HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, AMERICAN MOTORISTSINSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS. No. 36143.Supreme Court of Florida.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BROWN v. BIRDSEYE DIVISION OF GENERAL FOODS CORP., 200 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1967). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BROWN v. BIRDSEYE DIVISION OF GENERAL FOODS CORP.,200 So.2d 177(Fla. 1967)

LATTIE G. BROWN, PETITIONER, v. BIRDSEYE DIVISION OF GENERAL FOODS

CORPORATION, HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, AMERICAN MOTORISTS

INSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS.

No. 36143.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 21, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Clifton L. Howell, Jr. and Phipps Linn, for petitioner.

Calvin A. Pope and Peter P. Behuniak, Pope Burton, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral argument. We findPage 178that in entering the order under attack the respondent Commission did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney's fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and BARNS (Ret.), JJ., concur.