Opinion · Fllaw Florida

SIMMONITE v. KITTEL, 159 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1964)

159 So.2d 645

Type
Opinion
Court
Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction
Fllaw
Date
1964-01-17
Topic
general

SIMMONITE v. KITTEL, 159 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1964) HENRY G. SIMMONITE, PETITIONER, v. RYAN VON ALVORDEN KITTEL, RESPONDENT. No. 32790.Supreme Court of Florida.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SIMMONITE v. KITTEL, 159 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1964). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SIMMONITE v. KITTEL,159 So.2d 645(Fla. 1964)
HENRY G. SIMMONITE, PETITIONER, v. RYAN VON ALVORDEN KITTEL, RESPONDENT.
No. 32790.
Supreme Court of Florida.
January 17, 1964.
Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Dismissing certiorari Fla.App.,152 So.2d 817.
Carr Warren, Miami, for petitioner.

Joseph J. Gersten, Miami, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued and that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C.J., O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and HEWITT, Circuit Judge, concur.Page 646