Opinion · Alabama Court of Appeals
Tucker v. State
42 Ala. App. 174
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Alabama Court of Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- Alabama
- Date
- 1963-06-18
- Topic
- litigation
CATES, Judge. This is an appeal on the record proper from a judgment based on a verdict of guilty on an indictment for grand larceny of an automobile. On arraignment it affirmatively appears that the defendant was without counsel. No waiver appears. Under Hamilton v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tucker v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
This is an appeal on the record proper from a judgment based on a verdict of guilty on an indictment for grand larceny of an automobile.
On arraignment it affirmatively appears that the defendant was without counsel. No waiver appears. Under Hamilton v. State, 273 Ala. 504, 142 So.2d 868, Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52, 82 S.Ct. 157, 7 L.Ed.2d 114, and Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799
Reversed and remanded.