Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

SCHWARTZMAN v. KEOSKIE, ET AL., 117 Fla. 168 (1934)

BENJAMIN SCHWARTZMAN v. AUBY KEOSKIE, 157 So. 926 (Fla. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1934-11-03
Topic: general

SCHWARTZMAN v. KEOSKIE, ET AL., 117 Fla. 168 (1934) 157 So. 926 BENJAMIN SCHWARTZMAN v. AUBY KEOSKIE, et al.Supreme Court of Florida,Division B. Opinion Filed November 3, 1934. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed SCHWARTZMAN v. KEOSKIE, ET AL., 117 Fla. 168 (1934). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

SCHWARTZMAN v. KEOSKIE, ET AL.,117 Fla. 168(1934)

157 So. 926

BENJAMIN SCHWARTZMAN v. AUBY KEOSKIE,et al.

Supreme Court of Florida,

Division B.

Opinion Filed November 3, 1934.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, H. F. Atkinson, Judge.

Copeland Therrell,for Appellant;

No appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM. —

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of thePage 169decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.