Opinion · Supreme Court of Florida
White v. Crandall
105 Fla. 70
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Florida
- Jurisdiction
- Florida
- Date
- 1931-11-13
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- holding that once a purchaser accepts a deed pursuant to a contract for sale, “the transaction is closed, and the purchaser is confined to his action for breach of the covenant”
- no "averment that at the time of the alleged representations by plaintiffs or their agents they knew the same to be false and were made for the purpose of deceiving defendant"
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed White v. Crandall. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 72 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 73 While in procedural matters a wide discretion is accorded the trial court, yet in the absence of anything to indicate trifling with the processes of the court, a final judgment on demurrer to pleas should not in general be rendered the same day an order sustaining a demurrer is filed for record, where the defendant or his counsel has no knowledge or notice of the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend, or of the application for final judgment made the same day the order on the demurrer is filed for record.