Opinion · Fllaw Florida

CONE ET UX. v. ARMSTRONG, 102 Fla. 1139 (1931)

136 So. 688

Type: Opinion
Court: Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction: Fllaw
Date: 1931-10-08
Topic: general

CONE ET UX. v. ARMSTRONG, 102 Fla. 1139 (1931) 136 So. 688 J. L. CONE, and VERA GRAHAM CONE, his wife, Appellants, vs. C.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CONE ET UX. v. ARMSTRONG, 102 Fla. 1139 (1931). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CONE ET UX. v. ARMSTRONG,102 Fla. 1139(1931)

136 So. 688

J. L. CONE, and VERA GRAHAM CONE, his wife,Appellants,vs. C. G. ARMSTRONG,

Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida,

Division B.

Decision filed October 8, 1931.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; L. L. Parks, Judge.Page 1140

Allen Dixon,for Appellants;Whitaker, Himes Whitaker,for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. —

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P.J., AND TERRELL AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.