Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

HOWELL v. HOWELL, 90 Fla. 254 (1925)

LANIE HOWELL, Appellant, v. EDWARD B. HOWELL, LULA HOWELL JOHNSON & BIRDIEHOWELL, Appellees., 105 So. 735 (Supreme Court of Florida,En Banc. 1925)

Type
Opinion
Court
Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction
Florida
Date
1925-07-27
Topic
general

HOWELL v. HOWELL, 90 Fla. 254 (1925) 105 So. 735 LANIE HOWELL, Appellant, v. EDWARD B. HOWELL, LULA HOWELL JOHNSON AND BIRDIEHOWELL, Appellees.Supreme Court of Florida,En Banc. Decision Filed July 27, 1925.Petition for Rehearing Denied September 25, 1925.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HOWELL v. HOWELL, 90 Fla. 254 (1925). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HOWELL v. HOWELL,90 Fla. 254(1925)
105 So. 735
LANIE HOWELL,Appellant,v. EDWARD B. HOWELL, LULA HOWELL JOHNSON AND BIRDIE
HOWELL,Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida,
En Banc.
Decision Filed July 27, 1925.
Petition for Rehearing Denied September 25, 1925.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; Daniel A. Simmons, Judge.
N. K. McGill,for Appellant;F. D. Brennan,for Appellees.
PER CURIAM. —
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

WEST, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, TERRELL AND BROWN, J. J., concur.Page 255