Opinion · Fllaw Florida

BURKS v. STATE, 697 So.2d 529 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1997)

Tavares BURKS, a/k/a Tavores Tilik Burks, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida,Appellee., 697 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Type: Opinion
Court: Fllaw Florida
Jurisdiction: Fllaw
Date: 1997-05-16
Topic: general

BURKS v. STATE, 697 So.2d 529 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1997) Tavares BURKS, a/k/a Tavores Tilik Burks, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida,Appellee. No. 95-04232.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 16, 1997.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BURKS v. STATE, 697 So.2d 529 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1997). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BURKS v. STATE,697 So.2d 529(Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1997)

Tavares BURKS, a/k/a Tavores Tilik Burks, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida,

Appellee.

No. 95-04232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Robert B. Bennett, Jr., Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Austin H. Maslanik, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.See Brown v. State,575 So.2d 1360(Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.