Opinion · Louisiana Court Opinions

PEARCE v. BALTAZAR, 533 So.2d 359 (La. 1988)

MARGARET ROBERTS PEARCE, WIFE OF/AND JAMES PEARCE v. ALBERT BALTAZAR ANDHIS INSURER, UNITED STATES Fid. & Guar. COMPANY.JANE F. HOOFERWERF v. ALBERT BALTAZAR & SELMA BALTAZAR., 533 So. 2d 359 (La. 1988)

Type: Opinion
Court: Louisiana Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Date: 1988-11-28
Topic: general

PEARCE v. BALTAZAR, 533 So.2d 359 (La. 1988) MARGARET ROBERTS PEARCE, WIFE OF/AND JAMES PEARCE v. ALBERT BALTAZAR ANDHIS INSURER, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY.JANE F. HOOFERWERF v. ALBERT BALTAZAR AND SELMA BALTAZAR.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PEARCE v. BALTAZAR, 533 So.2d 359 (La. 1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PEARCE v. BALTAZAR,533 So.2d 359(La. 1988)

MARGARET ROBERTS PEARCE, WIFE OF/AND JAMES PEARCE v. ALBERT BALTAZAR AND

HIS INSURER, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY.

JANE F. HOOFERWERF v. ALBERT BALTAZAR AND SELMA BALTAZAR.

No. 88-C-2382.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 28, 1988.

In re Baltazar, Albert; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 88-CA-0070, 88-CA-0071; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. "A", Nos. 292-345, 292-282.

[1] Denied. The result is correct.