Opinion · Florida Court Opinions

BAKER v. STATE, 201 So.2d 253 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1967)

L.Z. BAKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF Fla., APPELLEE., 201 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Type: Opinion
Court: Florida Court Opinions
Jurisdiction: Florida
Date: 1967-08-04
Topic: general

BAKER v. STATE, 201 So.2d 253 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1967) L.Z. BAKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. No. 1199.District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed BAKER v. STATE, 201 So.2d 253 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1967). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

BAKER v. STATE,201 So.2d 253(Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1967)

L.Z. BAKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

No. 1199.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 4, 1967.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Thomas M. Coker, Jr., Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Fred T. Gallagher, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vero Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by L.Z. Baker, one of four defendants who were convicted of breaking and entering with the intent to commit petty larceny.

The court has carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of counsel for the parties. From such consideration we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., and LEAVENGOOD, C.R., Associate Judge, concur.