Opinion · Txlaw Texas

EX PARTE HAMER, 128 Tex. 218 (1936)

EX PARTE D. E. HAMER, O. M. CARMICHAEL & W. M. COX., 97 S.W.2d 673 (Tex. 1936)

Type
Opinion
Court
Texas
Jurisdiction
Texas
Date
1936-10-28
Topic
general

EX PARTE HAMER, 128 Tex. 218 (1936) 97 S.W.2d 673 EX PARTE D. E. HAMER, O. M. CARMICHAEL AND W.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed EX PARTE HAMER, 128 Tex. 218 (1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

EX PARTE HAMER,128 Tex. 218(1936)
97 S.W.2d 673
EX PARTE D. E. HAMER, O. M. CARMICHAEL AND W. M. COX.
No. 7160.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Decided October 28, 1936.
Original proceeding for habeas corpus involving the same offense, and at the same time, as that for which Winfield Morten, ante, p. 216, was declared in contempt of court.

The case was submitted to the Court sitting with the Commission of Appeals, and opinion written by Judge German of the Commission was adopted as the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Habeas corpus granted and relators dismissed.
Hughes Monroe,of Dallas, for relators.
MR. JUDGE GERMAN delivered the opinion for the court.
This is a companion case with the case of Winfield Morten, ante, 216,97 S.W.2d 672, this day decided by this Court. It involves the same facts and the same situation, and these parties were declared in contempt at the same time as was Winfield Morten for violating the same injunction.

In accordance with the decision in that case the writ of habeas corpus is granted and the relators are ordered discharged.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court, October 28, 1936.