Opinion · Molaw Missouri

STATE v. BARNARD, 954 S.W.2d 662 (Mo.App.W.D. 1997)

954 S.W.2d 662

Type: Opinion
Court: Molaw Missouri
Jurisdiction: Molaw
Date: 1997-10-28
Topic: general

STATE v. BARNARD, 954 S.W.2d 662 (Mo.App.W.D. 1997) STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JACK D. BARNARD, Appellant. Nos.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. BARNARD, 954 S.W.2d 662 (Mo.App.W.D. 1997). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. BARNARD,954 S.W.2d 662(Mo.App.W.D. 1997)

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JACK D. BARNARD, Appellant.

Nos. WD 52123, WD 53445

Consolidated Case

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

October 28, 1997

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BATES COUNTY, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM J. ROBERTS, JUDGE.

A. Renae Adamson, State Public Defender Office, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, MO 65201, for appellant.

Lisa A. Fischer, Attorney General Office, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Howard, P.J., Riederer and Hanna, JJ.

[1]ORDER

PER CURIAM

[2] The defendant appeals his conviction and eight year sentence for sodomy (§566.060.3, RSMo 1994) as a prior offender (§566.060and §558.016, RSMo 1994), and the denial of his Rule 29.15 V.A.M.R. motion for post-conviction relief. Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b) V.A.M.R.