Opinion · Txlaw Texas

DALBOSCO v. HUBBARD, 907 S.W.2d 453 (Tex. 1995)

Donald C. DALBOSCO, Petitioner, v. J.D. HUBBARD, II & Michael McGinnis,Respondents., 907 S.W.2d 453 (Tex. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Txlaw Texas
Jurisdiction
Txlaw
Date
1995-05-11
Topic
general

DALBOSCO v. HUBBARD, 907 S.W.2d 453 (Tex. 1995) 907 S.W.2d 453, 38 Tex. Sup.Ct. J. 631 Donald C. DALBOSCO, Petitioner, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DALBOSCO v. HUBBARD, 907 S.W.2d 453 (Tex. 1995). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DALBOSCO v. HUBBARD,907 S.W.2d 453(Tex. 1995)
907 S.W.2d 453, 38 Tex. Sup.Ct. J. 631
Donald C. DALBOSCO, Petitioner, v. J.D. HUBBARD, II and Michael McGinnis,
Respondents.
No. 95-0077.
Supreme Court of Texas.
May 11, 1995.
On Application for Writ of Error to the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas; Eric Andell, Judge.
Joe G. Roady, Houston, for petitioner.

Paul J. McConnell, III, Ben A. Baring, Jr., Stephen C. Reid, III, Houston, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner's application for writ of error is denied. The Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals' discussion of the affirmative defense of justification, excuse or privilege to interfere.888 S.W.2d 224, 229-30.