Opinion · Texas Supreme Court
Texas Employers' Insurance v. White
129 Tex. 659
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Texas Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Texas
- Date
- 1937-06-30
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The defendant in error having filed in this Court a remittitur of $1970.10 as of the date of the original judgment, which reduces the principal sum of that judgment from $6352.41 to $4382.31, and it appearing that the remittitur is sufficient to account for the greatest possible amount of excessiveness in the judgment, it is ordered that the judgment heretofore entered herein reversing and remanding the cause be set aside and in lieu thereof that the judgments of the trial court and of the Court of Civil Appeals be reformed so as to award to defendant in error a recovery of the amount above named and as reformed, that said judgments be affirmed. Texas & N. O. R. R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Texas Employers' Insurance v. White. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
The defendant in error having filed in this Court a remittitur of $1970.10 as of the date of the original judgment, which reduces the principal sum of that judgment from $6352.41 to $4382.31, and it appearing that the remittitur is sufficient to account for the greatest possible amount of excessiveness in the judgment, it is ordered that the judgment heretofore entered herein reversing and remanding the cause be set aside and in lieu thereof that the judgments of the trial court and of the Court of Civil Appeals be reformed so as to award to defendant in error a recovery of the amount above named and as reformed, that said judgments be affirmed. Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. *660 Carr, 91 Texas 332, 43 S. W. 18. The costs of appeal will be assessed against defendant in error.
Opinion delivered June 30, 1937.