Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary
365 N.C. 305
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2011-11-10
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Hall v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 28 opinions
Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Hall v. Toreros II, Inc., 363 N.C. 114, 678 S.E.2d 656 (2009).
AFFIRMED.