Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
State v. Gobal
362 N.C. 342
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2008-06-12
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "Statements elicited by a defendant on cross-examination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law."
- “Statements elicited by a defendant on crossexamination are, even if error, invited error, by which a defendant cannot be prejudiced as a matter of law.”
- “[O]ur Supreme Court has determined that when one witness vouch[es] for the veracity of another witness, such testimony is an opinion which is not helpful to the jury's determination of a fact in issue and is therefore excluded.” (alterations in original) (cleaned up)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Gobal. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 34 opinions
STATE v. GOBAL,362 N.C. 342(2008)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AUDREY GOBAL.
No. 545A07.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Filed June 12, 2008.