Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re P.L.P.

360 N.C. 360

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
2006-03-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that jurisdiction in the district court was "terminated by the trial court's order to `close' the case" and that DSS was required to file a new petition alleging neglect
  • affirming as to issues raised in dissent, which did not include the remedy, if any, for a trial court's failure to timely enter an order on termination of parental rights

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re P.L.P.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
75 opinions
IN RE P.L.P.,360 N.C. 360(2006)
IN THE MATTER OF P.L.P.
No. 521A05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Filed March 3, 2006.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,173 N.C. App. 1,618 S.E.2d 241(2005), affirming a judgment terminating respondent's parental rights entered 23 March 2004 by Judge Peter L. Roda in District Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 February 2006.
Charlotte W. Nallan for petitioner-appellee BuncombeCounty Department of Social Services.M. Victoria Jayne for respondent-appellant father.Judy N. Rudolph for appellee Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.Page 361