Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Little v. Omega Meats I, Inc.

360 N.C. 164

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Date: 2005-12-16
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Little v. Omega Meats I, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

LITTLE v. OMEGA MEATS I, INC.,360 N.C. 164(2005)

TERI HARVEY LITTLE AND FRANK DONALD LITTLE, JR. v. OMEGA MEATS I, INC.,

THOMAS A. CASSANO, AND RONALD LEE SMITH.

No. 438A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Filed December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. §7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,___ N.C. App. ___,615 S.E.2d 45(2005), affirming a judgment entered 20 August 2003 by Judge Michael E. Helms directing a verdict in favor of defendants Omega Meats I, Inc. and Thomas A. Cassano in Superior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 December 2005.

Schoch Schoch, by Arch K. Schoch IV, forplaintiff-appellants.Horton and Gsteiger, P.L.L.C., by Urs R. Gsteiger, fordefendant-appellees Omega Meats I, Inc. and Thomas A.Cassano.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.Page 165