Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 493 (2002)
563 S.E.2d 190
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 2002-01-01
- Topic
- general
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 493 (2002) 563 S.E.2d 190Supreme Court of North Carolina 2002 McMILLAN v. N.C. DEP'T OF CORR. No. 431P01 Case below: 144 N.C. App. 722 Petition by petitioner (Ann McMILLAN) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 9 May 2002.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 355 N.C. 493 (2002). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,355 N.C. 493(2002)
563 S.E.2d 190
Supreme Court of North Carolina
2002
No. 431P01
Case below:144 N.C. App. 722
Petition by petitioner (Ann McMILLAN) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 9 May 2002.
MEDEARIS v. TRUSTEES OF MYERS PARK BAPTIST CHURCH
No. 67P02
Case below: 147 N.C. App. ___ (28 December 2002)
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 18 April 2002.
PRIOR v. PRUETT
No. 367P01
Case below:143 N.C. App. 612
Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 9 May 2002.
REYNOLDS v. REYNOLDS
No. 38A02
Case below:147 N.C. App. 566
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 9 May 2002.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. v. N.C. DEP'T OF ENV'T NATURAL RES.
No. 144P02
Case below: 148 N.C. App. ___ (19 February 2002)
Petition by respondent for writ of supersedeas denied 9 May 2002. Petition by respondent for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 9 May 2002.Page 494