Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
SMITH v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, 347 N.C. 669 (1998)
500 S.E.2d 82
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1998-01-01
- Topic
- general
SMITH v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, 347 N.C. 669 (1998) 500 S.E.2d 82 DONALD L. SMITH, HAROLD D. COLEY, JR., D. REID COTTRELL, AND E.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed SMITH v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, 347 N.C. 669 (1998). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
SMITH v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,347 N.C. 669(1998)
500 S.E.2d 82
DONALD L. SMITH, HAROLD D. COLEY, JR., D. REID COTTRELL, AND E. MICHAEL
LATTA, AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, AND
MURIEL OFFERMAN, SECRETARY OF REVENUE
No. 61A98
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed 18 February 1998
On initiative of this Court pursuant to G.S.7A-31(a) and Rule 15 (e)(2) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
Discretionary review prior to a determination by the Court of Appeals is allowedex mero motu. The record on appeal, all exhibits, and other documents in this case shall be certified to this Court by the Court of Appeals.
The case shall be docketed in this Court as of the date of this order's certification. Parties who have already submitted briefs to the Court of Appeals may elect to rebrief their case for the Supreme Court so long as their new briefs are filed in accordance with Appellate Rule 13 (a)(1).
By order of the Court in Conference, this the 18th day of February, 1998.
Lake, J. For the CourtPage 670