Opinion · Court of Appeals of Virginia
Robinson v. Commonwealth
11 Va. Law Rep. 154
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Virginia
- Jurisdiction
- Virginia
- Date
- 1994-08-23
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- deferring to a trial court’s factual finding of no prosecutorial misconduct in deciding whether double jeopardy principles prevented retrial of a defendant
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Robinson v. Commonwealth. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
Opinion
On January 11, 1994, a panel of this Court affirmed appellant’s convictions of second degree murder and the use of a firearm in the commission of murder, holding that his re-prosecution was not barred on double jeopardy grounds. See Robinson v. Commonwealth, 17 Va. App. 551, 439 S.E.2d 622 (1994). Appellant’s petition for hearing en banc was granted on March 24, 1994, and the mandate of the January 11, 1994 opinion was stayed.
The appeal was reheard en banc on June 2, 1994. For the reasons stated in the original majority opinion, the Court affirms the decision of the trial court. Therefore, the stay of the mandate of the January 11, 1994 opinion is lifted, and the case is affirmed in accordance with that opinion and its adoption by this order.
Judges Benton, Coleman, Koontz and Elder, for the reasons stated in Judge Benton’s dissent from the original decision, Robinson v. Commonwealth, 17 Va. App. 551, 557, 439 S.E.2d *815 622, 626 (1994) (Benton, J. dissenting), would reverse the conviction and dismiss the case.