Opinion · Court of Appeals of Virginia

Jones v. Commonwealth

Jones v. Commonwealth, 10 Va. Law Rep. 408 (Va. Ct. App. 1993)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Jurisdiction
Virginia
Date
1993-10-19
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that a firearm under Code § 18.2-308.2 is a device "that propel[s] a projectile by an explosion or discharge of gun powder"

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jones v. Commonwealth. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
33 opinions

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

Opinion

In Jones v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 354, 429 S.E.2d 615 (1993), a majority of a panel of this Court reversed the judgment of the trial court as it pertained to Case No. CR91002806-02. Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc was granted and argued on September 10, 1993. Upon consideration whereof, we reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel’s majority opinion. Accordingly, the stay of this Court’s May 11, 1993 mandate is lifted, and the mandate is reinstated.

Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker and Elder would affirm the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of the panel’s decision.

It is ordered that the trial court allow court-appointed counsel for the appellant an additional $200 for services rendered on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses.