Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

MANNING v. FLETCHER, 331 N.C. 114 (1992)

413 S.E.2d 798

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1992-01-01
Topic
general

MANNING v. FLETCHER, 331 N.C. 114 (1992) 413 S.E.2d 798 ARTHUR BENNETT MANNING AND WIFE, LUGENE MANNING v. CLARENCEERNEST FLETCHER, JR. AND NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE No. 229PA91Supreme Court of North Carolina Filed 5 March 1992 ON discretionary review of a unanimous opinion of the Court of Appeals, 102 N.C. App. 392, 402 S.E.2d 648 (1991), which reversed a judgment entered on 14 December 1989 in Superior Court, NASH County, by Allsbrook, J., and remanded for entry of a judgment in accordance with the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed MANNING v. FLETCHER, 331 N.C. 114 (1992). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

MANNING v. FLETCHER,331 N.C. 114(1992)
413 S.E.2d 798
ARTHUR BENNETT MANNING AND WIFE, LUGENE MANNING v. CLARENCE
ERNEST FLETCHER, JR. AND NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE
No. 229PA91
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed 5 March 1992
ON discretionary review of a unanimous opinion of the Court of Appeals,102 N.C. App. 392,402 S.E.2d 648(1991), which reversed a judgment entered on 14 December 1989 in Superior Court, NASH County, by Allsbrook, J., and remanded for entry of a judgment in accordance with the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 February 1992.
Ralph G. Willey, P.A., by Ralph G. Willey, III, for plaintiff appellees.

Poyner Spruill, by Ernie K. Murray, for defendant appellant North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.

Justice MEYER did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.Page 115