Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

NASH v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS, 328 N.C. 267 (1991)

CLAUDE E. NASH & JANIS WESSOLLECK v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ANDELECTRONICS, INC., CHARLES ROBINSON, MOTOROLA, INC. & AIRCALL, INC., 400 S.E.2d 36 (N.C. 1991)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1991-01-01
Topic: general

NASH v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS, 328 N.C. 267 (1991) 400 S.E.2d 36 CLAUDE E. NASH AND JANIS WESSOLLECK v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ANDELECTRONICS, INC., CHARLES ROBINSON, MOTOROLA, INC. AND AIRCALL, INC.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed NASH v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS, 328 N.C. 267 (1991). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

NASH v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS,328 N.C. 267(1991)

400 S.E.2d 36

CLAUDE E. NASH AND JANIS WESSOLLECK v. MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS AND

ELECTRONICS, INC., CHARLES ROBINSON, MOTOROLA, INC. AND AIRCALL, INC.

No. 568PA89

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Filed 7 February 1991

ON discretionary review of the decision of the Court of Appeals,96 N.C. App. 329,385 S.E.2d 537(1989), reversing a judgment entered by Owens, J., in the Superior Court, HENDERSON County on 29 June 1988. Heard in the Supreme Court 6 September 1990.

Patrick U. Smathers, P.A., by Patrick U. Smathers, for plaintiffs appellees.

Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes and Davis, P.A., by Roy W. Davis, Jr. and Michelle Rippon, for defendants appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in this decision.Page 268