Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Leake v. SUNBELT LIMITED OF RALEIGH
Leake v. SUNBELT Ltd. OF RALEIGH, 324 N.C. 578 (N.C. 1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1989-06-27
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- summary judgment proper on fraudulent representation claim where plaintiffs failed to allege defendants’ intent at the time the alleged fraudulent misrepresentations were made and thus failed to satisfy Rule 9(b)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Leake v. SUNBELT LIMITED OF RALEIGH. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 15 opinions
381 S.E.2d 774 (1989) 324 N.C. 578
Linda S. LEAKE, Donald C. Kordich, Ralph A. Carlen, Claire R. Carlen, Joan Fraser, Brian Hailes, Monica Janet Sinclair, Linda Miller, Beth Anne Barbuti, Frederick L. Croom, Joy Croom, Mary Margaret Sawyer, Bruce Williamson, Catherine R. Williamson, Joy Weiss, K. Ray Allen, and George Bednarz
No. 172P89.
Linda S. LEAKE, Donald C. Kordich, Ralph A. Carlen, Claire R. Carlen, Joan Fraser, Brian Hailes, Monica Janet Sinclair, Linda Miller, Beth Anne Barbuti, Frederick L. Croom, Joy Croom, Mary Margaret Sawyer, Bruce Williamson, Catherine R. Williamson, Joy Weiss, K. Ray Allen, and George Bednarz
v.
SUNBELT LIMITED OF RALEIGH, Holland Gaines and S. Alan Gaines.
No. 172P89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
June 27, 1989.McMillan, Kimzey & Smith, Raleigh, for defendants.
Thorp, Fuller & Slifkin, Raleigh, for plaintiffs.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. § 7A-31, the following order was entered *775 and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 1989."