Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

UTILITIES COMMISSION v. TELEPHONE CO., 264 N.C. 423 (1965)

STATE OF N.C., EX REL. N.C. UTILITIESCOMMISSION v. WESTCO Tel. COMPANY., 142 S.E.2d 13 (N.C. 1965)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1965-01-01
Topic
general

UTILITIES COMMISSION v. TELEPHONE CO., 264 N.C. 423 (1965) 142 S.E.2d 13 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, EX REL. NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIESCOMMISSION v. WESTCO TELEPHONE COMPANY.Supreme Court of North Carolina Filed 19 May, 1965. APPEAL from the North Carolina Utilities Commission by the defendant, Westco Telephone Company, pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 62-99, from an order finding and concluding the fair value of the property of the defendant, used and useful in rendering service to the public as of 31 December 1963, to be $4,120,000, and that a fair and reasonable rate of return thereon was 3.80%.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed UTILITIES COMMISSION v. TELEPHONE CO., 264 N.C. 423 (1965). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

UTILITIES COMMISSION v. TELEPHONE CO.,264 N.C. 423(1965)
142 S.E.2d 13
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, EX REL. NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES
COMMISSION v. WESTCO TELEPHONE COMPANY.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed 19 May, 1965.
APPEAL from the North Carolina Utilities Commission by the defendant, Westco Telephone Company, pursuant to the provisions of G.S.62-99, from an order finding and concluding the fair value of the property of the defendant, used and useful in rendering service to the public as of 31 December 1963, to be $4,120,000, and that a fair and reasonable rate of return thereon was 3.80%.
The defendant assigns error.
Edward B. Hipp, Commission Attorney.

Attorney General Bruton, Asst. Attorney General Charles W. Barbee, Jr.

Van Winkle, Walton, Buck Wall; Herbert L. Hyde for defendant.
PER CURIAM.
On authority of the decision in the case of Utilities Com. v. Finishing Plant, et al, ante, 416, in which G.S.62-99is held unconstitutional, this appeal is dismissed with the right of the appellant to appeal to the Superior Court of Wake County, if so advised, within the time and in the manner set out in the above cited case.

Appeal dismissed.Page 424