Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann
Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann, 204 N.C. 682 (N.C. 1933)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1933-05-24
- Topic
- general
Pee Cueiam. The facts found by the judge are set out in his order. These facts are sufficient to support the order. There was evidence at the hearing tending to sustain the findings of fact. The amounts which the defendant is required to pay for the reasonable subsistence of plaintiff, pendente lite, and for compensation to her counsel were determined by the judge in the exercise of his sound discretion.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
The facts found by the judge are set out in his order. These facts are sufficient to support the order. There was evidence at the hearing tending to sustain the findings of fact. The amounts which the defendant is required to pay for the reasonable subsistence of plaintiff, pendente lite, and for compensation to her counsel were determined by the judge in the exercise of his sound discretion. They are not subject to review by this Court. Anderson v. Anderson, 183 N. C., 139, 110 S. E., 863. They may be modified at any time before the trial of the action upon the application of either party. C. S., 1667. The order is
Affirmed.