Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

ALSTON v. WILLIAMS, 181 N.C. 478 (1921)

LIZZIE ALSTON, Ex’[r, x], ETC., v. R. E. WILLIAMS., 106 S.E. 136 (N.C. 1921)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1921-01-01
Topic: general

ALSTON v. WILLIAMS, 181 N.C. 478 (1921) 106 S.E. 136 LIZZIE ALSTON, EXECUTRIX, ETC., v. R. E. WILLIAMS.Supreme Court of North Carolina (Filed 9 March, 1921.) APPEAL by defendant from Lyon, J., at the September Term, 1920, of WARREN.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ALSTON v. WILLIAMS, 181 N.C. 478 (1921). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ALSTONv. WILLIAMS,181 N.C. 478(1921)

106 S.E. 136

LIZZIE ALSTON, EXECUTRIX, ETC., v. R. E. WILLIAMS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

(Filed 9 March, 1921.)

APPEAL by defendant fromLyon, J., at the September Term, 1920, of WARREN.

This is an action to recover the value of certain cotton which the plaintiff alleged the defendant received as agent and failed to account for.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

Frank H. Gibbs for plaintiff.T. T. Hicks for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record creates the impression with us that the plaintiff has probably recovered more than the defendant ought to pay, but we find no error which would justify disturbing the verdict and judgment.

No error.