Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

STATE v. CAO, 87P06 (N.C. 6-29-2006)

STATE OF N.C. v. HUU THE CAO., 634 S.E.2d 537 (N.C. 2006)

Type
Opinion
Court
North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
2006-06-29
Topic
general

STATE v. CAO, 87P06 (N.C. 6-29-2006) 634 S.E.2d 537 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HUU THE CAO. No. 87P06Supreme Court of North Carolina 29 June 2006 Russell J. Hollers, III, Durham, for Huu The Cao.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. CAO, 87P06 (N.C. 6-29-2006). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE v. CAO, 87P06 (N.C. 6-29-2006)
634 S.E.2d 537
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HUU THE CAO.
No. 87P06
Supreme Court of North Carolina
29 June 2006
Russell J. Hollers, III, Durham, for Huu The Cao.

Richard G. Sowerby, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 21st day of February 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S.7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006.