Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Haste v. American Home Products Corp.
439 U.S. 955
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1978-11-06
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- concluding that Model Rules protect information imparted by a prospective client even if the representation is declined
- manufacturer satisfied duty by warning prescribing veterinarian of health risks to animats vaccinated by their owners with its prescription vaccine
- attorney-client relationship does not arise only in agency manner, but also where layperson submits confidential information to lawyer with reasonable belief that latter is former’s attorney
- “fiduciary relationship existing between lawyer and client extends to preliminary consultation by a prospective client with a view to retention of the lawyer, although actual employment does not result”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Haste v. American Home Products Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 151 opinions
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.