Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Haste v. American Home Products Corp.

439 U.S. 955

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-11-06
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • concluding that Model Rules protect information imparted by a prospective client even if the representation is declined
  • manufacturer satisfied duty by warning prescribing veterinarian of health risks to animats vaccinated by their owners with its prescription vaccine
  • attorney-client relationship does not arise only in agency manner, but also where layperson submits confidential information to lawyer with reasonable belief that latter is former’s attorney
  • “fiduciary relationship existing between lawyer and client extends to preliminary consultation by a prospective client with a view to retention of the lawyer, although actual employment does not result”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Haste v. American Home Products Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
151 opinions

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.