Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Peoples v. Judicial Standards Commission

442 U.S. 929

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-06-11
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “A proceeding to enforce a judgment is collateral to the judgment, and therefore no inquiry into its regularity or validity can be permitted in such a proceeding.”
  • legal or factual impossibility of committing offense not a defense to conspiracy claim
  • conspiracy exists where two parties agree even though third person’s agreement is feigned
  • subject matter jurisdiction cannot be conferred upon a court by consent, waiver, or estoppel
  • “although [18 U.S.C.] § 2314 cannot be violated unless there are in fact stolen goods, a conspiracy to violate that section occurs when two or more persons agree to attempt to commit acts which include all the elements of a crime under that section and any overt act is done”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Peoples v. Judicial Standards Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
173 opinions

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.