Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Taylor v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.
441 U.S. 923
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1979-04-23
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that an express warranty for a period of one year explicitly extended to future performance
- ordering production of taxpayer’s “internal audit reports,” which had identified accounting procedures that misstated revenues and expenses
- unauthorized phone access to coomputer supports wire fraud conviction where computer source code considered property under statute
- sale of storage facilities to a food processing plant; cause of action accrued on the date when installation was completed
- “extension of the normal warranty period does not occur in the usual case, even though all warranties in a sense apply to future performance of goods”
- courts have been harsh in determining whether warranty is one of future performance
- "The correct response of a trial judge, when confronted with allegations of improper jury contact, is to give notice to the parties and to question the jurors on the record about any alleged incident.”
- cause of action under § 2-725 accrues upon initial installation of product
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Taylor v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 178 opinions
Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.