Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Thompson v. Covington Housing Development Corp.
439 U.S. 1116
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1979-01-15
- Topic
- finance
How later courts describe this case
- discussing factors relevant to determining whether the named plaintiff may appoint new counsel to appeal the approval of a settlement negotiated by former class counsel
- counseling against redeciding questions "absent the most cogent reasons such as the avoidance of manifest injustice"
- experience prerequisite for eligibility for apprenticeship program and on-the-job training found .to perpetuate effects of past discrimination; district court ordered to consider whether experience prerequisite should be shortened
- “To be sure, the assent of named Plaintiffs is not a prerequisite to court approval.”
- previous panel determination not binding in light of intervening Supreme Court decision
- acceptors of individual back pay tender do not waive rights to appeal
- simultaneous negotiations "weigh heavily" against settlement approval
- backpay and reinstatement available under Title VII
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thompson v. Covington Housing Development Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 220 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.