Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Andre v. Board of Trustees

434 U.S. 1013

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-01-09
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that foreign agency was a person
  • having spent most of their early years in limelight, sons of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg are public figures for purposes of subsequent commentary on Rosenberg trials
  • upholding requirement that employees establish residency within a certain time period after beginning employment with the municipality
  • deferring to congressional determination that causation existed “as a matter of law”
  • factual evidence in the administrative record showed that South African seal hunting practices "will respond" to stricter enforcement of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
  • "The same standards of constitutional protection apply to an invasion of privacy and to libel actions."
  • claim that bank examinations were conducted negligently when examiners failed to appoint a receiver is precluded by discretionary exception
  • sons of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg are public figures for purposes of subsequent commentary on Rosenberg trials since they spent their earlier years in the limelight

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Andre v. Board of Trustees. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
155 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.