Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Geisinger v. Board of County Commissioners

435 U.S. 905

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-02-27
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "the giving of multiple `Allen' charges is to be avoided and may constitute reversible error..."
  • “the preferable rule is to uphold the trial judge’s exercise of discretion unless he acts arbitrarily or irrationally”
  • jury instructed that "[i]t is important that a decision ... be reached here, and I really see no good reasons why a decision cannot be reached"
  • harmless error analysis applies when trial judge answers jury's note without defendant or his counsel being present
  • second deadlock instruction upheld after an 11-1 split for conviction, known to the trial court, continued and a signed note by the holdout juror delivered to the court
  • introduction of gun to establish bank robbery defendant’s identity and opportunity, held permissible
  • affirming decision to give second modified Allen charge
  • two ABA instructions not reversible error

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Geisinger v. Board of County Commissioners. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
137 opinions

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.