Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Texas Petroleum Co. v. Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A.

429 U.S. 1041

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1977-01-10
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the prevention of a chilling effect on the First Amendment has little application where actual malice, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, has been shown
  • noting that “[c]onciliation rather than formal court proceedings remains the preferred method of settling [discrimination] disputes”
  • upholding the exercise of personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state magazine publisher without mention of the first amendment
  • affirming without discussion the district court's calculation of back pay award which had deducted unemployment insurance
  • affirming judgment for section 1983 plaintiff based upon beatings by police officer.
  • "... a non-tenured teacher has no 'expectancy' of continued employment, whatever may be the policies of the institution, where there exists a statutory tenure system."
  • damages suffered when barge negligently severed power line to factory measured by value of lost production less saved expenses
  • nontenured teacher has no expectancy of continued employment where there exists a statutory tenure system

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Texas Petroleum Co. v. Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
276 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.