Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.

429 U.S. 917

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-11-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "One offense is a lesser included offense of another only if, in order to commit the greater offense, it is necessary to commit the lesser.”
  • public closure at post-trial sentencing hearing not appealable under Cohen since defendant has no constitutional right to compel a secret trial
  • bank officer’s acquittal of willful misapplication of funds did not bar prosecution for violation of campaign contribution statute involving same funds where the two crimes were distinct and separate offenses

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
52 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.