Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Whitfield v. Burns

431 U.S. 910

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1977-05-16
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the Government’s invocation of restrictive contract principles is “disingenuous”
  • enforcing district attorney's promise that the defendant would be paroled within a certain time
  • government’s proffer of information at sentencing to correct defendant’s misstatements did not breach plea bargain under which government had agreed not to take position on sentence
  • prosecutor absolutely immune from suit for damages alleging nonfulfillment of negotiated plea agreement
  • court may order specific enforcement of plea agreement improperly promising parole release
  • remedy for broken plea bargain is discretionary with court

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Whitfield v. Burns. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
64 opinions

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. M. D. Ala.