Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. Mathews
423 U.S. 827
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1975-10-06
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating that, “even under the “arbitrary and capricious” standard agency action will not be upheld where inadequacy of explanation frustrates review”
- remand and not vacatur of regulations appropriate where indications are that agency made rational choice but failed to fully include rationale in record
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. Mathews. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.