Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Prince v. Common Pleas Court of Allegheny County

423 U.S. 936

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1975-11-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • interest of the state and of the witnesses in preserving the confidentiality of undercover agents in narcotics cases justified exclusion of public during witness testimony
  • not error to clear courtroom for testimony of undercover agent to preserve his value to law enforcement agencies
  • proper to exclude public from courtoom during testimony of a confidential informant
  • to preserve confidentiality of undercover agents in narcotics case

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Prince v. Common Pleas Court of Allegheny County. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
50 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.