Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Keiley v. Hinkson
426 U.S. 906
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1976-06-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- declining to determine the applicability of the rule to the 2d Circuit and deciding the issue on other grounds
- “A regulation not reasonably related to a valid government interest may not stand in the face of a due process attack.”
- Neither the fact that the FBI’s prior suspicions were confirmed by the illegal [] search, nor the inclusion of references to that search in the affidavit supporting the federal warrant, ipso facto, establishes the taint urged by [the suspect]
- ordinance passed to regulate the preservation and maintenance of buildings in the historic French Quarter of New Orleans and requiring a permit from a commission before construction on, or alteration of, buildings in that area upheld as proper exercise of the police power
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Keiley v. Hinkson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 111 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.