Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Mahoney v. Laundry, Dry Cleaning & Dye House Workers International Union, Local 93, of Springfield, Missouri

Mahoney v. Laundry, Dry Cleaning & Dye House Workers Int’l Union, Loc. 93, of Springfield, Mo., 419 U.S. 825 (1974)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-10-15
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that the right to testify is one guaranteed by federal law
  • “The federal government, however, can use the same evidence testified to by defendants before the grand jury if it can demonstrate that the evidence to be used against defendants came from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimonies.”
  • same conclusions as in Lyle, supra

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mahoney v. Laundry, Dry Cleaning & Dye House Workers International Union, Local 93, of Springfield, Missouri. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
72 opinions

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.