Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.

406 U.S. 949

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-05-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • only those persons who have a privacy interest in the residence in which the tapped phone is located have standing
  • once a dispute is covered by the Act, federal law governs all questions of interpretation, construction, validity, revocability and enforceability
  • seaman drowned in tug-tow case where cargo overloading and improper lifeboat storage were statutory violations
  • arbitration between member firms of dispute arising before plaintiff became member of Exchange
  • dispute concerning sale of securities is covered by Federal Arbitration Act and “[o]nce a dispute is covered by the Act, federal law applies to all questions of interpretation, construction, validity, revocability, and enforceability.”
  • appellant lacked standing to suppress conversations intercepted by wiretap on co-defendant’s telephone
  • tapes may be properly sealed by another judge when issuing judge unavailable
  • common sense reading of affidavit to support finding of probable cause

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
204 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.