Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bartsch v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

393 U.S. 826

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1968-10-14
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "libel per se is any publication which exposes a person to distrust, hatred, contempt, ridicule, obloquy".
  • broad conveyance of motion picture rights encompassed all uses that might reasonably fall within the medium described by the license
  • grant of “exclusive moving picture rights” included right to “talkies” even though such technical improve ment may have been unknown and not within contemplation of parties at time of grant
  • “[i]f the words [of the license] are broad enough to cover the new use, ... the burden of framing and negotiating an exception should fall on the grantor” of the licensed rights

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bartsch v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
81 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.