Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
A. P. Smith Manufacturing Co. v. United States
385 U.S. 1003
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1967-01-09
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that “overriding purpose” of § 16(b) is to make it “unprofitable for insiders to engage in short-swing speculation.”
- conversion of preferred stock into common stock found not to constitute a sale of the preferred stock
- “[W]hen proof establishes a factual situation which would just as well justify defendants’ conduct as to lead to an inference of conspiracy, then plaintiff has failed to carry her burden.”
- appellants as private persons were incapable of violating the substantive statute requiring action under “color of law,” but they could be found guilty of aiding and abetting a violation of that statute by an individual acting under “color of law”
- teacher may not be terminated without due process
- Id. teacher whose contract was not renewed
- Certified drug MER-29 proves to cause cataracts.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed A. P. Smith Manufacturing Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 197 opinions
Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.