Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Badgley v. Hare
385 U.S. 114
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1966-11-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- discussed in Sincock v. Gately at 262 F. Supp. 832-833
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Badgley v. Hare. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
385 U.S. 114 (1966)
BADGLEY ET AL.
No. 505.
BADGLEY ET AL.
v.
HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
No. 505.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided November 21, 1966. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.William T. Gossett for appellants.
Frank J. Kelly, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Curtis G. Beck, Assistant Attorney General, for Hare; Theodore Sachs for Scholle et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.