Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

McGill v. Ryals

385 U.S. 19

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1966-10-17
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the case was not appropriate for a three-judge court. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that a three-judge court was properly convened and would affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McGill v. Ryals. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
42 opinions
Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the case was not appropriate for a three-judge court.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that a three-judge court was properly convened and would affirm the judgment of the lower court.