Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Vetere v. Allen
382 U.S. 825
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1965-10-11
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- owner of a trade secret must do something to protect himself or the secret will be lost by its disclosure
- “It is also the rule that where [collateral estoppel] is asserted, the earlier determination must have been of a question of fact essential to the earlier judgment.”
- court will imply provision in contract when necessary to carry intention of parties, as evinced by whole contract, into effect
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vetere v. Allen. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 96 opinions
Ct. App. N. Y. Cer-tiorari denied.